Review



random-effects linear regression model  (STATA Corporation)


Bioz Verified Symbol STATA Corporation is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 90

    Structured Review

    STATA Corporation random-effects linear regression model
    Random Effects Linear Regression Model, supplied by STATA Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/random-effects linear regression model/product/STATA Corporation
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    random-effects linear regression model - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    90
    SAS institute linear mixed effect regression models with a random intercept for each subject proc mixed
    Linear Mixed Effect Regression Models With A Random Intercept For Each Subject Proc Mixed, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/linear mixed effect regression models with a random intercept for each subject proc mixed/product/SAS institute
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    linear mixed effect regression models with a random intercept for each subject proc mixed - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    STATA Corporation random-effects linear regression model
    Random Effects Linear Regression Model, supplied by STATA Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/random-effects linear regression model/product/STATA Corporation
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    random-effects linear regression model - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    MathWorks Inc linear mixed-effects random-intercept regression model
    Linear Mixed Effects Random Intercept Regression Model, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/linear mixed-effects random-intercept regression model/product/MathWorks Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    linear mixed-effects random-intercept regression model - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    SAS institute random effects linear regression models glimmix procedure in sas 9.3
    Random Effects Linear Regression Models Glimmix Procedure In Sas 9.3, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/random effects linear regression models glimmix procedure in sas 9.3/product/SAS institute
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    random effects linear regression models glimmix procedure in sas 9.3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    STATA Corporation random effects linear regression model stata xtmixed
    Random Effects Linear Regression Model Stata Xtmixed, supplied by STATA Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/random effects linear regression model stata xtmixed/product/STATA Corporation
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    random effects linear regression model stata xtmixed - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    SAS institute multivariable linear mixed-effects regression model with random intercepts
    Multivariable Linear Mixed Effects Regression Model With Random Intercepts, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/multivariable linear mixed-effects regression model with random intercepts/product/SAS institute
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    multivariable linear mixed-effects regression model with random intercepts - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    STATA Corporation random effect general linear regression model
    Random Effect General Linear Regression Model, supplied by STATA Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/random effect general linear regression model/product/STATA Corporation
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    random effect general linear regression model - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    STATA Corporation random effects linear regression models stata xtreg with mle
    Random Effects Linear Regression Models Stata Xtreg With Mle, supplied by STATA Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/random effects linear regression models stata xtreg with mle/product/STATA Corporation
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    random effects linear regression models stata xtreg with mle - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    STATA Corporation repeated-measures random effects linear regression models (-xtreg)
    Multivariable-adjusted regression estimates a for the difference b in the percentage of workers commuting by bicycle in 2000 and 2010 according to joint levels c of the distance (km) between the tract and the trail system c and proportion of commuting trips that cross the trail system d . a Regression models included: time-varying and tract-level variables for distance to trail system, proportion to work-related trips that cross the trail system, total work-related trips, intersection density, population density, median household income, professional workforce, workforce aged 13–34 years, total length of bicycle lanes, maximum reach of bicycle lane network, maximum reach of network comprising both bicycle lanes and off-road trails, and the time-invariant variable for commuting by bicycle in 1990. Estimated effects for changes for all time-varying variables were modeled by including a year* variable interaction term. b Differences were obtained using the ‘margins’ post-estimation command following repeated-measures random effects linear regression models <t>(-xtreg-)</t> in Stata. c P -value for interaction = 0.06. d Levels of predictor variables reflect the percentiles of the variable distribution for combined 2000 and 2010 data. For distance: 25 th = 1.08 km; 50 th = 2.83 km; 75 th = 5.91 km. For proportion of commuting trips that cross the trail: 25 th = 0.11; 50 th = 0.29; 75 th = 0.42
    Repeated Measures Random Effects Linear Regression Models ( Xtreg), supplied by STATA Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/repeated-measures random effects linear regression models (-xtreg)/product/STATA Corporation
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    repeated-measures random effects linear regression models (-xtreg) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    STATA Corporation linear random-effects regression models
    Multivariable-adjusted regression estimates a for the difference b in the percentage of workers commuting by bicycle in 2000 and 2010 according to joint levels c of the distance (km) between the tract and the trail system c and proportion of commuting trips that cross the trail system d . a Regression models included: time-varying and tract-level variables for distance to trail system, proportion to work-related trips that cross the trail system, total work-related trips, intersection density, population density, median household income, professional workforce, workforce aged 13–34 years, total length of bicycle lanes, maximum reach of bicycle lane network, maximum reach of network comprising both bicycle lanes and off-road trails, and the time-invariant variable for commuting by bicycle in 1990. Estimated effects for changes for all time-varying variables were modeled by including a year* variable interaction term. b Differences were obtained using the ‘margins’ post-estimation command following repeated-measures random effects linear regression models <t>(-xtreg-)</t> in Stata. c P -value for interaction = 0.06. d Levels of predictor variables reflect the percentiles of the variable distribution for combined 2000 and 2010 data. For distance: 25 th = 1.08 km; 50 th = 2.83 km; 75 th = 5.91 km. For proportion of commuting trips that cross the trail: 25 th = 0.11; 50 th = 0.29; 75 th = 0.42
    Linear Random Effects Regression Models, supplied by STATA Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/linear random-effects regression models/product/STATA Corporation
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    linear random-effects regression models - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Multivariable-adjusted regression estimates a for the difference b in the percentage of workers commuting by bicycle in 2000 and 2010 according to joint levels c of the distance (km) between the tract and the trail system c and proportion of commuting trips that cross the trail system d . a Regression models included: time-varying and tract-level variables for distance to trail system, proportion to work-related trips that cross the trail system, total work-related trips, intersection density, population density, median household income, professional workforce, workforce aged 13–34 years, total length of bicycle lanes, maximum reach of bicycle lane network, maximum reach of network comprising both bicycle lanes and off-road trails, and the time-invariant variable for commuting by bicycle in 1990. Estimated effects for changes for all time-varying variables were modeled by including a year* variable interaction term. b Differences were obtained using the ‘margins’ post-estimation command following repeated-measures random effects linear regression models (-xtreg-) in Stata. c P -value for interaction = 0.06. d Levels of predictor variables reflect the percentiles of the variable distribution for combined 2000 and 2010 data. For distance: 25 th = 1.08 km; 50 th = 2.83 km; 75 th = 5.91 km. For proportion of commuting trips that cross the trail: 25 th = 0.11; 50 th = 0.29; 75 th = 0.42

    Journal: The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

    Article Title: Municipal investment in off-road trails and changes in bicycle commuting in Minneapolis, Minnesota over 10 years: a longitudinal repeated cross-sectional study

    doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0475-1

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Multivariable-adjusted regression estimates a for the difference b in the percentage of workers commuting by bicycle in 2000 and 2010 according to joint levels c of the distance (km) between the tract and the trail system c and proportion of commuting trips that cross the trail system d . a Regression models included: time-varying and tract-level variables for distance to trail system, proportion to work-related trips that cross the trail system, total work-related trips, intersection density, population density, median household income, professional workforce, workforce aged 13–34 years, total length of bicycle lanes, maximum reach of bicycle lane network, maximum reach of network comprising both bicycle lanes and off-road trails, and the time-invariant variable for commuting by bicycle in 1990. Estimated effects for changes for all time-varying variables were modeled by including a year* variable interaction term. b Differences were obtained using the ‘margins’ post-estimation command following repeated-measures random effects linear regression models (-xtreg-) in Stata. c P -value for interaction = 0.06. d Levels of predictor variables reflect the percentiles of the variable distribution for combined 2000 and 2010 data. For distance: 25 th = 1.08 km; 50 th = 2.83 km; 75 th = 5.91 km. For proportion of commuting trips that cross the trail: 25 th = 0.11; 50 th = 0.29; 75 th = 0.42

    Article Snippet: Estimated effects for changes for all time-varying variables were modeled by including a year* variable interaction term. b Differences were obtained using the ‘margins’ post-estimation command following repeated-measures random effects linear regression models (-xtreg-) in Stata. c P -value for interaction = 0.06. d Levels of predictor variables reflect the percentiles of the variable distribution for combined 2000 and 2010 data.

    Techniques: